Zoning, Planning and Use
Apr. 17, 2003
Judicial Limbo
Forum Column By Andrew W. Schwartz and Bill Higgins In Chevron USA Inc. v. Lingle , 02-15867, the 9th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals faces a basic and important question: whether a federal court can substitute its judgment about the wisdom of economic regulatory legislation for the judgment of the elected legislators who enacted the law. To preserve our system of representative democracy and to confine the unelected federal judiciary to its properly limited role in our constitutional system,
Forum Column
By Andrew W. Schwartz and Bill Higgins
In Chevron USA Inc. v. Lingle, 02-15867, the 9th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals faces a basic and important question: whether a federal court can substitute its judgment about the wisdom of...
By Andrew W. Schwartz and Bill Higgins
In Chevron USA Inc. v. Lingle, 02-15867, the 9th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals faces a basic and important question: whether a federal court can substitute its judgment about the wisdom of...
To continue reading, please subscribe.
For only $95 a month (the price of 2 article purchases)
Receive unlimited article access and full access to our archives,
Daily Appellate Report, award winning columns, and our
Verdicts and Settlements.
Or
$795 for an entire year!
For only $95 a month (the price of 2 article purchases)
Receive unlimited article access and full access to our archives,
Daily Appellate Report, award winning columns, and our
Verdicts and Settlements.
Or
$795 for an entire year!
Or access this article for $45
(Purchase provides 7-day access to this article. Printing, posting or downloading is not allowed.)
Already a subscriber?
Sign In