Real Estate/Development
Apr. 15, 2003
Two New Premises-Liability Decisions Favor Plaintiffs
BY MICHAEL PAUL THOMAS There can be little question that when it comes to holding those who own or manage property liable for third-party criminal conduct on their premises, the recent judicial trend has been quite favorable to defendants - especially with respect to questions of foreseeabilty (and thus duty) and causation. However, two different Courts of Appeal recently reversed summary judgments in favor of defendants who controlled locations where third-party criminal assaults occurred.




There can be little question that when it comes to holding those who own or manage property liable for third-party criminal conduct on their premises, the recent judicial trend has been quite favorable to defendants - especially with respect to questions of foreseeabilty (and thus duty) and causation. However, two different Courts of Appeal recently reversed summary judgments in favor of defendants who controlled locations where third-party crim...
For only $95 a month (the price of 2 article purchases)
Receive unlimited article access and full access to our archives,
Daily Appellate Report, award winning columns, and our
Verdicts and Settlements.
Or
$795 for an entire year!
Or access this article for $45
(Purchase provides 7-day access to this article. Printing, posting or downloading is not allowed.)
Already a subscriber?
Sign In