This is the property of the Daily Journal Corporation and fully protected by copyright. It is made available only to Daily Journal subscribers for personal or collaborative purposes and may not be distributed, reproduced, modified, stored or transferred without written permission. Please click "Reprint" to order presentation-ready copies to distribute to clients or use in commercial marketing materials or for permission to post on a website. and copyright (showing year of publication) at the bottom.
Subscribe to the Daily Journal for access to Daily Appellate Reports, Verdicts, Judicial Profiles and more...

Law Practice

Mar. 31, 2007

Diminished Protections

Employment Column - By Daniel A. Crawford and Robert J. Drexler Jr. - Everyone knows that California is the place to be if you're a plaintiff in an employment case, but the case law may require courts to enforce clauses requiring other forums.

EMPLOYMENT COLUMN

By Daniel A. Crawford and Robert J. Drexler Jr.

      Most employees work without a contract. However, California employees who work under contract for an out-of-state company may be in for a nasty surprise if the contract contains either a forum-selection clause or a choice-of-law provision. If those employees file a case in California and the company's home state is designated in the contract, they may be forced ...

To continue reading, please subscribe.
For only $95 a month (the price of 2 article purchases)
Receive unlimited article access and full access to our archives,
Daily Appellate Report, award winning columns, and our
Verdicts and Settlements.
Or
$795 for an entire year!

Or access this article for $45
(Purchase provides 7-day access to this article. Printing, posting or downloading is not allowed.)

Already a subscriber?

Enewsletter Sign-up