This is the property of the Daily Journal Corporation and fully protected by copyright. It is made available only to Daily Journal subscribers for personal or collaborative purposes and may not be distributed, reproduced, modified, stored or transferred without written permission. Please click "Reprint" to order presentation-ready copies to distribute to clients or use in commercial marketing materials or for permission to post on a website. and copyright (showing year of publication) at the bottom.
Subscribe to the Daily Journal for access to Daily Appellate Reports, Verdicts, Judicial Profiles and more...

Government

Aug. 5, 2010

Judge Scales Back Ballot Measure

A Sacramento judge ruled Tuesday that the attorney general's description of a closely watched November ballot measure to suspend the state's global warming law is biased and ordered changes in the how the proposition will be presented to voters.

By Fiona Smith

Daily Journal Staff Writer

A Sacramento judge ruled Tuesday that the attorney general's description of a closely watched November ballot measure to suspend the state's global warming law is biased and ordered changes in the how the proposition will be presented to voters.

Proposition 23 takes aim at AB32, a 2006 state law that requires the state to cut its greenhouse gas emissions to 1990 levels by 2020,...

To continue reading, please subscribe.
For only $95 a month (the price of 2 article purchases)
Receive unlimited article access and full access to our archives,
Daily Appellate Report, award winning columns, and our
Verdicts and Settlements.
Or
$795 for an entire year!

Or access this article for $45
(Purchase provides 7-day access to this article. Printing, posting or downloading is not allowed.)

Already a subscriber?

Enewsletter Sign-up