This is the property of the Daily Journal Corporation and fully protected by copyright. It is made available only to Daily Journal subscribers for personal or collaborative purposes and may not be distributed, reproduced, modified, stored or transferred without written permission. Please click "Reprint" to order presentation-ready copies to distribute to clients or use in commercial marketing materials or for permission to post on a website. and copyright (showing year of publication) at the bottom.
Subscribe to the Daily Journal for access to Daily Appellate Reports, Verdicts, Judicial Profiles and more...

Law Practice

Jul. 23, 2010

Lawyers Weigh in on Manatt Ruling

Read what some of them had to say.

The state Supreme Court on Wednesday declined to reconsider a lower court's decision that Manatt, Phelps & Phillips can be sued for malicious prosecution for a case they brought on behalf of a client. Several legal industry officials have said the lower court's decision could present a bad omen for other firms. No amicus letters were filed in support of the Franklin Mint Co.'s position, while nearly two dozen amicus letters were filed in support of Manatt's request for the ...

To continue reading, please subscribe.
For only $95 a month (the price of 2 article purchases)
Receive unlimited article access and full access to our archives,
Daily Appellate Report, award winning columns, and our
Verdicts and Settlements.
Or
$795 for an entire year!

Or access this article for $45
(Purchase provides 7-day access to this article. Printing, posting or downloading is not allowed.)

Already a subscriber?

Enewsletter Sign-up