This is the property of the Daily Journal Corporation and fully protected by copyright. It is made available only to Daily Journal subscribers for personal or collaborative purposes and may not be distributed, reproduced, modified, stored or transferred without written permission. Please click "Reprint" to order presentation-ready copies to distribute to clients or use in commercial marketing materials or for permission to post on a website. and copyright (showing year of publication) at the bottom.
Subscribe to the Daily Journal for access to Daily Appellate Reports, Verdicts, Judicial Profiles and more...

Perspective

Jul. 21, 2010

U.S. Navy's Fault Should Be Considered Despite Immunity

While the U.S. Navy enjoys immunity from suit under the Federal Tort Claims Act, this does not operate as a shield for injuries arising from asbestos exposure, explain Michael Fox and Alison Beanum of Sedgwick.

By Michael L. Fox and Alison K. Beanum

In an important decision for defendants in multi-party mass tort actions, the California Court of Appeal for the 1st Appellate District recently held in Collins v. Plant Insulation that the Navy's immunity under 28 U.S.C. Section 2671, et seq. (the Federal Tort Claims Act) does not preclude an allocation of fault under Proposition 51 for injuries arising from asbestos exposure. The court firmly rejected pl...

To continue reading, please subscribe.
For only $95 a month (the price of 2 article purchases)
Receive unlimited article access and full access to our archives,
Daily Appellate Report, award winning columns, and our
Verdicts and Settlements.
Or
$795 for an entire year!

Or access this article for $45
(Purchase provides 7-day access to this article. Printing, posting or downloading is not allowed.)

Already a subscriber?

Enewsletter Sign-up