Insurance
Jul. 16, 2010
The Continuous Injury Trigger: A Cat-and-Mouse Game
The battle between providers of commercial general liability policies and the courts over the limits of coverage is nothing new, writes Eric Schindler of McKennon|Schindler.
Setting the metes and bounds for coverage under standard form commercial general liability (CGL) policies has been a cat-and-mouse game over the years - insurers and their lawyers attempting to narrow coverage and courts frustrating those efforts. For example, in 1995 the California Supreme Court adopted a "continuous injury trigger" based on the standard "occurrence" policy forms in effect at that time for claims ...
For only $95 a month (the price of 2 article purchases)
Receive unlimited article access and full access to our archives,
Daily Appellate Report, award winning columns, and our
Verdicts and Settlements.
Or
$795 for an entire year!
Or access this article for $45
(Purchase provides 7-day access to this article. Printing, posting or downloading is not allowed.)
Already a subscriber?
Sign In