This is the property of the Daily Journal Corporation and fully protected by copyright. It is made available only to Daily Journal subscribers for personal or collaborative purposes and may not be distributed, reproduced, modified, stored or transferred without written permission. Please click "Reprint" to order presentation-ready copies to distribute to clients or use in commercial marketing materials or for permission to post on a website. and copyright (showing year of publication) at the bottom.
Subscribe to the Daily Journal for access to Daily Appellate Reports, Verdicts, Judicial Profiles and more...

U.S. Supreme Court

Jul. 3, 2010

Counseling Terrorists

Barry McDonald of Pepperdine University School of Law explores how the Supreme Court has allowed humanitarian lawyers to counsel whomever they choose - except when the client is a terrorist.

By Barry P. McDonald

The Supreme Court's recent decision barring humanitarian lawyers from counseling terrorist groups on legal means of resolving their conflicts has evoked widespread response and more than a little confusion. Major newspapers are calling on Congress to fix the Court's wrongheaded decision even though the Court was merely affirming Congress' original judgment that even "good" aid to such groups can be turned to bad ...

To continue reading, please subscribe.
For only $95 a month (the price of 2 article purchases)
Receive unlimited article access and full access to our archives,
Daily Appellate Report, award winning columns, and our
Verdicts and Settlements.
Or
$795 for an entire year!

Or access this article for $45
(Purchase provides 7-day access to this article. Printing, posting or downloading is not allowed.)

Already a subscriber?

Enewsletter Sign-up