By David A. Gerber
Nearly a century ago Justice Oliver Wendell Holmes Jr., posited that a plaintiff whose own use is infringing may not pursue a trademark infringement claim. The plaintiff's dubious conduct is "a matter to which the defendant could refer when the plaintiff sought to exclude him from doing just what the plaintiff had done himself." Ubeda v. Zialcita, 226 U.S. 452, 454 (1913).
This is the defense of...
To continue reading, please subscribe.
For only $95 a month (the price of 2 article purchases)
Receive unlimited article access and full access to our archives,
Daily Appellate Report, award winning columns, and our
Verdicts and Settlements.
Or
$795 for an entire year!
For only $95 a month (the price of 2 article purchases)
Receive unlimited article access and full access to our archives,
Daily Appellate Report, award winning columns, and our
Verdicts and Settlements.
Or
$795 for an entire year!
Or access this article for $45
(Purchase provides 7-day access to this article. Printing, posting or downloading is not allowed.)
Already a subscriber?
Sign In