This is the property of the Daily Journal Corporation and fully protected by copyright. It is made available only to Daily Journal subscribers for personal or collaborative purposes and may not be distributed, reproduced, modified, stored or transferred without written permission. Please click "Reprint" to order presentation-ready copies to distribute to clients or use in commercial marketing materials or for permission to post on a website. and copyright (showing year of publication) at the bottom.
Subscribe to the Daily Journal for access to Daily Appellate Reports, Verdicts, Judicial Profiles and more...

Labor/Employment

Feb. 15, 2014

Appellate panel sides with county in suit over retiree health care

Retired Orange County employees lacked the evidence to show that a longtime health care benefit qualified as an implied contract between workers and the county, a 9th Circuit panel ruled Thursday.


By Paul Jones


Daily Journal Staff Writer


The state Supreme Court ruled in 2011 that a municipality can be held to an "implied contract" with public employees. But Orange County retirees who hoped that ruling would help them win a suit against the county over imposed changes to their health benefits were dealt a blow Thursday when an appellate panel ruled that they lacked sufficient evidence such a contract existed.


According to Micha...

To continue reading, please subscribe.
For only $95 a month (the price of 2 article purchases)
Receive unlimited article access and full access to our archives,
Daily Appellate Report, award winning columns, and our
Verdicts and Settlements.
Or
$795 for an entire year!

Or access this article for $45
(Purchase provides 7-day access to this article. Printing, posting or downloading is not allowed.)

Already a subscriber?

Enewsletter Sign-up