This is the property of the Daily Journal Corporation and fully protected by copyright. It is made available only to Daily Journal subscribers for personal or collaborative purposes and may not be distributed, reproduced, modified, stored or transferred without written permission. Please click "Reprint" to order presentation-ready copies to distribute to clients or use in commercial marketing materials or for permission to post on a website. and copyright (showing year of publication) at the bottom.
Subscribe to the Daily Journal for access to Daily Appellate Reports, Verdicts, Judicial Profiles and more...

Intellectual Property

Feb. 1, 2014

Quinn Emanuel chastised over disclosure, but avoids major punishment

A magistrate judge has sanctioned Quinn Emanuel Urquhart & Sullivan LLP and its client Samsung Electronics Co. Ltd. for violating a protective order in litigation with Apple Inc., but rejected any significant punishment.


By Kevin Lee


Daily Journal Staff Writer


SAN JOSE - A federal magistrate judge has sanctioned Quinn Emanuel Urquhart & Sullivan LLP and its client Samsung Electronics Co. Ltd. for violating a protective order in litigation with Apple Inc., but the court rejected levying any significant punishment.


U.S. Magistrate Judge Paul S. Grewal of San Jose declined to grant what he deemed the "ludicrously overbroad" sanctions that Apple and ...

To continue reading, please subscribe.
For only $95 a month (the price of 2 article purchases)
Receive unlimited article access and full access to our archives,
Daily Appellate Report, award winning columns, and our
Verdicts and Settlements.
Or
$795 for an entire year!

Or access this article for $45
(Purchase provides 7-day access to this article. Printing, posting or downloading is not allowed.)

Already a subscriber?

Enewsletter Sign-up