This is the property of the Daily Journal Corporation and fully protected by copyright. It is made available only to Daily Journal subscribers for personal or collaborative purposes and may not be distributed, reproduced, modified, stored or transferred without written permission. Please click "Reprint" to order presentation-ready copies to distribute to clients or use in commercial marketing materials or for permission to post on a website. and copyright (showing year of publication) at the bottom.
Subscribe to the Daily Journal for access to Daily Appellate Reports, Verdicts, Judicial Profiles and more...

Perspective

Jan. 23, 2014

Do we need an affluenza vaccine?

The proposed "affluenza" bill regarding lenient sentences is misplaced hysteria, giving the public a further false sense that judges are out of whack and criminals continue to run loose. By Dana Cole


By Dana Cole


A few weeks ago, a Texas drunk driving case created a media firestorm when the affluent teenager behind the wheel - who had killed four pedestrians - was sentenced to mere probation and rehab instead of the 20-year prison term prosecutors sought. The judge's argument in imposing this obviously too-lenient sentence? That the 16-year-old defendant, Ethan Couch, had been allowed to do pretty much whatever he wanted by his parents - and thus the real...

To continue reading, please subscribe.
For only $95 a month (the price of 2 article purchases)
Receive unlimited article access and full access to our archives,
Daily Appellate Report, award winning columns, and our
Verdicts and Settlements.
Or
$795 for an entire year!

Or access this article for $45
(Purchase provides 7-day access to this article. Printing, posting or downloading is not allowed.)

Already a subscriber?

Enewsletter Sign-up