In recent landmark decisions, the U.S. Supreme Court has drastically limited the availability of class action litigation as a vehicle for plaintiffs to prosecute civil actions on a representative basis. In 2010, the court decided Stolt-Nielsen v. Animal Feeds Int'l Corp., foreclosing plaintiffs who had contractually agreed to arbitrate their disputes under the Federal Arbitration Act (FAA) from pursuing class-wid...
To continue reading, please subscribe.
For only $95 a month (the price of 2 article purchases)
Receive unlimited article access and full access to our archives,
Daily Appellate Report, award winning columns, and our
Verdicts and Settlements.
Or
$795 for an entire year!
For only $95 a month (the price of 2 article purchases)
Receive unlimited article access and full access to our archives,
Daily Appellate Report, award winning columns, and our
Verdicts and Settlements.
Or
$795 for an entire year!
Or access this article for $45
(Purchase provides 7-day access to this article. Printing, posting or downloading is not allowed.)
Already a subscriber?
Sign In