The NCAA enforcement department suffered a significant setback last year after a series of missteps, most notably the impermissible investigative tactics employed in the University of Miami infractions case. During its high-profile investigation of extra benefits provided to student-athletes by a Miami booster, the enforcement staff made arrangements with an outside attorney to compel testimony through an unrelated bankruptcy proceeding of two witne...
To continue reading, please subscribe.
For only $95 a month (the price of 2 article purchases)
Receive unlimited article access and full access to our archives,
Daily Appellate Report, award winning columns, and our
Verdicts and Settlements.
Or
$795 for an entire year!
For only $95 a month (the price of 2 article purchases)
Receive unlimited article access and full access to our archives,
Daily Appellate Report, award winning columns, and our
Verdicts and Settlements.
Or
$795 for an entire year!
Or access this article for $45
(Purchase provides 7-day access to this article. Printing, posting or downloading is not allowed.)
Already a subscriber?
Sign In