Labor/Employment
Apr. 30, 2002
Lack of Notice May Not Result in More Days of Leave
Focus Column - Richard S. Rosenberg and John J. Manier - In Ragsdale v. Wolverine World Wide, 2002 DJDAR 3017 (U.S. March 19, 2002), the U.S. Supreme Court ruled that an employee was not entitled to additional sick leave under the Family Medical Leave Act, 29 U.S.C. Section 2601 et seq., simply because the employer failed to notify her in advance that her absences were covered under the act.
By Richard S. Rosenberg and John J. Manier
In Ragsdale v. Wolverine World Wide, 2002 DJDAR 3017 (U.S. March 19, 2002), the U.S. Supreme Court ruled that an employee was not enti...
For only $95 a month (the price of 2 article purchases)
Receive unlimited article access and full access to our archives,
Daily Appellate Report, award winning columns, and our
Verdicts and Settlements.
Or
$795 for an entire year!
Or access this article for $45
(Purchase provides 7-day access to this article. Printing, posting or downloading is not allowed.)
Already a subscriber?
Sign In