Overruling precedents can, of course, be seismic. But affirming long-established case law, as the U.S. Supreme Court did last week in Halliburton v. Erica P. John Fund, 2014 DJDAR 8004 (June 23, 2014), can have far-reaching consequences as well.
In Halliburton, the Supreme Court addressed the high-stakes question of whether to overrule, or substantially modify, the fraud-on-the market presumption of reliance that had be...
To continue reading, please subscribe.
For only $95 a month (the price of 2 article purchases)
Receive unlimited article access and full access to our archives,
Daily Appellate Report, award winning columns, and our
Verdicts and Settlements.
Or
$795 for an entire year!
For only $95 a month (the price of 2 article purchases)
Receive unlimited article access and full access to our archives,
Daily Appellate Report, award winning columns, and our
Verdicts and Settlements.
Or
$795 for an entire year!
Or access this article for $45
(Purchase provides 7-day access to this article. Printing, posting or downloading is not allowed.)
Already a subscriber?
Sign In