This is the property of the Daily Journal Corporation and fully protected by copyright. It is made available only to Daily Journal subscribers for personal or collaborative purposes and may not be distributed, reproduced, modified, stored or transferred without written permission. Please click "Reprint" to order presentation-ready copies to distribute to clients or use in commercial marketing materials or for permission to post on a website. and copyright (showing year of publication) at the bottom.
Subscribe to the Daily Journal for access to Daily Appellate Reports, Verdicts, Judicial Profiles and more...
You have to be a subscriber to view this page.

U.S. Supreme Court

Jul. 2, 2014

Roberts puts securities class action hyperbole to bed in Halliburton

Securities laws exist largely to promote honest and transparent market information and investor confidence; they are not bad for business or society. By Mark I. Labaton


By Mark I. Labaton


Overruling precedents can, of course, be seismic. But affirming long-established case law, as the U.S. Supreme Court did last week in Halliburton v. Erica P. John Fund, 2014 DJDAR 8004 (June 23, 2014), can have far-reaching consequences as well.


In Halliburton, the Supreme Court addressed the high-stakes question of whether to overrule, or substantially modify, the fraud-on-the market presumption of reliance that had be...

To continue reading, please subscribe.
For only $95 a month (the price of 2 article purchases)
Receive unlimited article access and full access to our archives,
Daily Appellate Report, award winning columns, and our
Verdicts and Settlements.
Or
$795 for an entire year!

Or access this article for $45
(Purchase provides 7-day access to this article. Printing, posting or downloading is not allowed.)

Already a subscriber?

Enewsletter Sign-up