This is the property of the Daily Journal Corporation and fully protected by copyright. It is made available only to Daily Journal subscribers for personal or collaborative purposes and may not be distributed, reproduced, modified, stored or transferred without written permission. Please click "Reprint" to order presentation-ready copies to distribute to clients or use in commercial marketing materials or for permission to post on a website. and copyright (showing year of publication) at the bottom.
Subscribe to the Daily Journal for access to Daily Appellate Reports, Verdicts, Judicial Profiles and more...

Law Practice

Apr. 15, 2017

Some fee fights simply mean more litigation

Defense arguments that ask a judge to disallow the majority of a winning plaintiff's claimed fees often fly in the face of reality..

Ken Moscaret

Ken Moscaret, a former business litigator with trial experience, is a 33-year expert on attorney fee reasonableness and litigation management in high-stakes fee cases.

See more...

From time to time, the legal media reports on a court-ordered attorney fees award which creates frustration among defense firms. Usually it involves a plaintiff's attorney (for example, in a civil rights case) receiving a large post-trial fee award after a jury awarded only a very small amount of damages at trial, even as little as $1 in nominal damages. The defense bar may be quick to wonder, "how can that fee award be justified?" In their initial reaction, the defense bar may not realize...

To continue reading, please subscribe.
For only $95 a month (the price of 2 article purchases)
Receive unlimited article access and full access to our archives,
Daily Appellate Report, award winning columns, and our
Verdicts and Settlements.
Or
$795 for an entire year!

Or access this article for $45
(Purchase provides 7-day access to this article. Printing, posting or downloading is not allowed.)

Already a subscriber?

Enewsletter Sign-up