Judges and Judiciary
Sep. 21, 2006
Arbitrators Now Face Geographic Gaps in Subpoena Powers
FOCUS COLUMN - Recently, the 2nd U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals held in Dynegy Midstream Services LP v. Trammochem, 451 F.3d 89 (2d Cir. 2006), that the Federal Arbitration Act does not authorize nationwide service of process.
Focus Column
By Shawn Hanson and Halia Barnes
Recently, the 2nd U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals held in Dynegy Midstream Services LP v. Trammochem, 451 F.3d 89 (2d Cir. 2006), that the Federal Arbitration Act does not authorize nationwide service of process. The court held that if a district court lacks personal jurisdiction, it does not have the authority to enforce a subpoen...
For only $95 a month (the price of 2 article purchases)
Receive unlimited article access and full access to our archives,
Daily Appellate Report, award winning columns, and our
Verdicts and Settlements.
Or
$795 for an entire year!
Or access this article for $45
(Purchase provides 7-day access to this article. Printing, posting or downloading is not allowed.)
Already a subscriber?
Sign In