This is the property of the Daily Journal Corporation and fully protected by copyright. It is made available only to Daily Journal subscribers for personal or collaborative purposes and may not be distributed, reproduced, modified, stored or transferred without written permission. Please click "Reprint" to order presentation-ready copies to distribute to clients or use in commercial marketing materials or for permission to post on a website. and copyright (showing year of publication) at the bottom.
Subscribe to the Daily Journal for access to Daily Appellate Reports, Verdicts, Judicial Profiles and more...

Perspective

Jan. 28, 2016

New test for strict liability lawsuits

Until last week, most California courts have held parties in a strict product liability action can never use a competitor's product to prove or deny that the challenged product is defective. By Victor Jih and Molly Russell

Victor Jih

Counsel
Wilson , Sonsini, Goodrich & Rosati

Phone: (323) 210-2900

Email: vjih@wgr.com

See more...

By Victor Jih and Molly Russell

Until last week, most California courts have held parties in a strict product liability action can never use a competitor's product to prove or deny that the challenged product is defective. A few courts, on the other hand, suggested parties can always use such evidence. Kim v. Toyota Motor Corp. offers a new rule in favor of case-by-case admissibility: Evidence of industry custom and practice ...

To continue reading, please subscribe.
For only $95 a month (the price of 2 article purchases)
Receive unlimited article access and full access to our archives,
Daily Appellate Report, award winning columns, and our
Verdicts and Settlements.
Or
$795 for an entire year!

Or access this article for $45
(Purchase provides 7-day access to this article. Printing, posting or downloading is not allowed.)

Already a subscriber?

Enewsletter Sign-up