This is the property of the Daily Journal Corporation and fully protected by copyright. It is made available only to Daily Journal subscribers for personal or collaborative purposes and may not be distributed, reproduced, modified, stored or transferred without written permission. Please click "Reprint" to order presentation-ready copies to distribute to clients or use in commercial marketing materials or for permission to post on a website. and copyright (showing year of publication) at the bottom.
Subscribe to the Daily Journal for access to Daily Appellate Reports, Verdicts, Judicial Profiles and more...

Perspective

Jan. 28, 2016

Even for unlimited plans, Uber must pay

The Northern District recently applied the California Court of Appeals' ruling that, employers are obligated to reimburse their employees for work-related personal phone expenses. By Marc Voses and Chang Liu

Marc Voses

See more...

By Marc Voses and Chang Liu

The U.S. District Court for the Northern District of California recently applied the California Court of Appeals' ruling that, under California Labor Code Section 2802, employers are obligated to reimburse their employees for work-related personal phone expenses, even if the employees have unlimited plans.

In Douglas O'Connor v. Uber Technologies Inc., 13-03826 (N.D. Cal. Dec. 9, 2015), class plaintiffs w...

To continue reading, please subscribe.
For only $95 a month (the price of 2 article purchases)
Receive unlimited article access and full access to our archives,
Daily Appellate Report, award winning columns, and our
Verdicts and Settlements.
Or
$795 for an entire year!

Or access this article for $45
(Purchase provides 7-day access to this article. Printing, posting or downloading is not allowed.)

Already a subscriber?

Enewsletter Sign-up