This is the property of the Daily Journal Corporation and fully protected by copyright. It is made available only to Daily Journal subscribers for personal or collaborative purposes and may not be distributed, reproduced, modified, stored or transferred without written permission. Please click "Reprint" to order presentation-ready copies to distribute to clients or use in commercial marketing materials or for permission to post on a website. and copyright (showing year of publication) at the bottom.
Subscribe to the Daily Journal for access to Daily Appellate Reports, Verdicts, Judicial Profiles and more...

Media

Nov. 21, 2006

Web Site Immunity

FOCUS COLUMN - By Chad Woodford - If a visitor posts libelous statements to a Web site and the Web site operator knows the statements are libelous, should the site operator be liable to the person who has been libeled?


Focus Column

By Chad Woodford

     
      If a visitor posts libelous statements to a Web site and the Web site operator knows the statements are libelous, should the site operator be liable to the person who has been libeled? That is the question the California Supreme Court will answer in December in the appeal from Barrett v. Rosenthal, 114 Cal.App.4th 1379 (2004). That case involves...

To continue reading, please subscribe.
For only $95 a month (the price of 2 article purchases)
Receive unlimited article access and full access to our archives,
Daily Appellate Report, award winning columns, and our
Verdicts and Settlements.
Or
$795 for an entire year!

Or access this article for $45
(Purchase provides 7-day access to this article. Printing, posting or downloading is not allowed.)

Already a subscriber?

Enewsletter Sign-up