This is the property of the Daily Journal Corporation and fully protected by copyright. It is made available only to Daily Journal subscribers for personal or collaborative purposes and may not be distributed, reproduced, modified, stored or transferred without written permission. Please click "Reprint" to order presentation-ready copies to distribute to clients or use in commercial marketing materials or for permission to post on a website. and copyright (showing year of publication) at the bottom.
Subscribe to the Daily Journal for access to Daily Appellate Reports, Verdicts, Judicial Profiles and more...

Ethics/Professional Responsibility

Mar. 29, 2011

Decision Clarifies Retainer Agreements

Clients might think having an open-ended retainer agreement with a law firm means they have a current attorney-client relationship. But that's not always the case, a state appellate court held.


By Jason W. Armstrong


Daily Journal Staff Writer


Clients might think that having an open-ended retainer agreement with a law firm means they have a current attorney-client relationship. That's not always the case, a state appellate court held recently, and lawyers say the opinion helps clarify the boundaries of retention contracts.


Newport Beach signed a so-called "framework" retainer agreement in 2005 with San Francisco-based e...

To continue reading, please subscribe.
For only $95 a month (the price of 2 article purchases)
Receive unlimited article access and full access to our archives,
Daily Appellate Report, award winning columns, and our
Verdicts and Settlements.
Or
$795 for an entire year!

Or access this article for $45
(Purchase provides 7-day access to this article. Printing, posting or downloading is not allowed.)

Already a subscriber?

Enewsletter Sign-up