This is the property of the Daily Journal Corporation and fully protected by copyright. It is made available only to Daily Journal subscribers for personal or collaborative purposes and may not be distributed, reproduced, modified, stored or transferred without written permission. Please click "Reprint" to order presentation-ready copies to distribute to clients or use in commercial marketing materials or for permission to post on a website. and copyright (showing year of publication) at the bottom.
Subscribe to the Daily Journal for access to Daily Appellate Reports, Verdicts, Judicial Profiles and more...

Litigation

Mar. 15, 2011

Trial Lawyers Spar Over Asbestos Claims

Defense firms complain their plaintiff counterparts are double dipping when it comes to recovery in the still-massive load of asbestos litigation throughout the country, an argument plaintiffs' lawyers roundly reject.


By Ciaran McEvoy


Daily Journal Staff Writer


"Double dipping," a term that commonly refers to bad table manners, is not typically an accusation heard flying in the courtroom.


But that's exactly what defense firms complain their plaintiff counterparts are doing when it comes to recovery in the still-massive load of asbestos litigation throughout the country.


The problem, they say, is that plaintiffs file separate claims w...

To continue reading, please subscribe.
For only $95 a month (the price of 2 article purchases)
Receive unlimited article access and full access to our archives,
Daily Appellate Report, award winning columns, and our
Verdicts and Settlements.
Or
$795 for an entire year!

Or access this article for $45
(Purchase provides 7-day access to this article. Printing, posting or downloading is not allowed.)

Already a subscriber?

Enewsletter Sign-up