We are now entering the third month of court reform under Family Code Section 217 (commonly known as the "Elkins Commission Recommendations"), and while many would argue that it is "too soon to tell" whether the return of oral testimony improves the administration of justice, there is one glaring problem. While the intent behind the recommendations issued by the task force were to restore a sense of due process to family law...
To continue reading, please subscribe.
For only $95 a month (the price of 2 article purchases)
Receive unlimited article access and full access to our archives,
Daily Appellate Report, award winning columns, and our
Verdicts and Settlements.
Or
$795 for an entire year!
For only $95 a month (the price of 2 article purchases)
Receive unlimited article access and full access to our archives,
Daily Appellate Report, award winning columns, and our
Verdicts and Settlements.
Or
$795 for an entire year!
Or access this article for $45
(Purchase provides 7-day access to this article. Printing, posting or downloading is not allowed.)
Already a subscriber?
Sign In