This is the property of the Daily Journal Corporation and fully protected by copyright. It is made available only to Daily Journal subscribers for personal or collaborative purposes and may not be distributed, reproduced, modified, stored or transferred without written permission. Please click "Reprint" to order presentation-ready copies to distribute to clients or use in commercial marketing materials or for permission to post on a website. and copyright (showing year of publication) at the bottom.
Subscribe to the Daily Journal for access to Daily Appellate Reports, Verdicts, Judicial Profiles and more...

Perspective

Mar. 12, 2011

Traffic Jam

Giving priority to two classes of litigants, at the expense of all others, has created a traffic jam in our family courts. By Fred Silberberg of Silberberg & Ross.


By Fred Silberberg


We are now entering the third month of court reform under Family Code Section 217 (commonly known as the "Elkins Commission Recommendations"), and while many would argue that it is "too soon to tell" whether the return of oral testimony improves the administration of justice, there is one glaring problem. While the intent behind the recommendations issued by the task force were to restore a sense of due process to family law...

To continue reading, please subscribe.
For only $95 a month (the price of 2 article purchases)
Receive unlimited article access and full access to our archives,
Daily Appellate Report, award winning columns, and our
Verdicts and Settlements.
Or
$795 for an entire year!

Or access this article for $45
(Purchase provides 7-day access to this article. Printing, posting or downloading is not allowed.)

Already a subscriber?

Enewsletter Sign-up