This is the property of the Daily Journal Corporation and fully protected by copyright. It is made available only to Daily Journal subscribers for personal or collaborative purposes and may not be distributed, reproduced, modified, stored or transferred without written permission. Please click "Reprint" to order presentation-ready copies to distribute to clients or use in commercial marketing materials or for permission to post on a website. and copyright (showing year of publication) at the bottom.
Subscribe to the Daily Journal for access to Daily Appellate Reports, Verdicts, Judicial Profiles and more...

California Courts of Appeal

Mar. 12, 2011

Judge's Anti-SLAPP Comments Challenged

An appellate court's scathing criticism of California's anti-SLAPP law (strategic lawsuits against public participation), prompted fans of the law to try to have the ruling erased from the public record.


By Laura Ernde


Daily Journal Staff Writer


Justice James A. Richman of the 1st District Court of Appeal used a published opinion two months ago to draw attention to California's anti-SLAPP law and accuse lawyers of abusing the procedure to gain litigation advantage.


Instead of prompting changes in the law, however, Richman's missive has had the opposite effect.


A coalition of 20 groups that rely on the law to ward off SLAPPs, ...

To continue reading, please subscribe.
For only $95 a month (the price of 2 article purchases)
Receive unlimited article access and full access to our archives,
Daily Appellate Report, award winning columns, and our
Verdicts and Settlements.
Or
$795 for an entire year!

Or access this article for $45
(Purchase provides 7-day access to this article. Printing, posting or downloading is not allowed.)

Already a subscriber?

Enewsletter Sign-up