Daily Journal Staff Writer
Justice James A. Richman of the 1st District Court of Appeal used a published opinion two months ago to draw attention to California's anti-SLAPP law and accuse lawyers of abusing the procedure to gain litigation advantage.
Instead of prompting changes in the law, however, Richman's missive has had the opposite effect.
A coalition of 20 groups that rely on the law to ward off SLAPPs, ...
To continue reading, please subscribe.
For only $95 a month (the price of 2 article purchases)
Receive unlimited article access and full access to our archives,
Daily Appellate Report, award winning columns, and our
Verdicts and Settlements.
Or
$795 for an entire year!
For only $95 a month (the price of 2 article purchases)
Receive unlimited article access and full access to our archives,
Daily Appellate Report, award winning columns, and our
Verdicts and Settlements.
Or
$795 for an entire year!
Or access this article for $45
(Purchase provides 7-day access to this article. Printing, posting or downloading is not allowed.)
Already a subscriber?
Sign In