This is the property of the Daily Journal Corporation and fully protected by copyright. It is made available only to Daily Journal subscribers for personal or collaborative purposes and may not be distributed, reproduced, modified, stored or transferred without written permission. Please click "Reprint" to order presentation-ready copies to distribute to clients or use in commercial marketing materials or for permission to post on a website. and copyright (showing year of publication) at the bottom.
Subscribe to the Daily Journal for access to Daily Appellate Reports, Verdicts, Judicial Profiles and more...

Contracts

Sep. 21, 2012

'Prevailing party’ attorney fees clause put to the test

Choosing whether to comply with mediation requests could make or break your case for prevailing party attorney fees. By Phil Diamond


By Phil Diamond


It is standard practice in many industries to contractually require mediation of disputes, and to give "teeth" to such requirements by conditioning the recovery of "prevailing party" attorney fees upon the parties' agreeing to first attempt to resolve their disputes through mediation. But these "prevailing party" attorney fees clauses are rarely tested.


In Cullen v. Corwin, 142 Cal. Rptr. 3rd 419 ...

To continue reading, please subscribe.
For only $95 a month (the price of 2 article purchases)
Receive unlimited article access and full access to our archives,
Daily Appellate Report, award winning columns, and our
Verdicts and Settlements.
Or
$795 for an entire year!

Or access this article for $45
(Purchase provides 7-day access to this article. Printing, posting or downloading is not allowed.)

Already a subscriber?

Enewsletter Sign-up