Long before a patent infringement trial launched last fall, Maitra, representing client Zynga Inc., tried to convince opposing counsel they had no case. "They said claim construction could change things, and I said the only way they could win was if the judge would construe dog for cat," Maitra said. She remembered walking up to the whiteboard in a conference room and drawing a dog, an equal sign and a cat, and then slashing a diagonal line through the...
To continue reading, please subscribe.
For only $95 a month (the price of 2 article purchases)
Receive unlimited article access and full access to our archives,
Daily Appellate Report, award winning columns, and our
Verdicts and Settlements.
Or
$795 for an entire year!
For only $95 a month (the price of 2 article purchases)
Receive unlimited article access and full access to our archives,
Daily Appellate Report, award winning columns, and our
Verdicts and Settlements.
Or
$795 for an entire year!
Or access this article for $45
(Purchase provides 7-day access to this article. Printing, posting or downloading is not allowed.)
Already a subscriber?
Sign In