Perspective
Apr. 13, 2016
Uber's correct: Court botched ruling
If the 9th Circuit follows precedent, including its own, the Uber appeal of the districts court's rulings on unconscionability and severability regarding its arbitration agreements with Uber drivers will be reversed. By David Faustman
In June 2014, the California Supreme Court decided Iskanian v. CLS Transportation, holding that a class action waiver in an arbitration agreement was valid, but that a purported waiver of a representative action under the Private Attorneys General Act, was not. The decision left open many procedural and substantive issues with which the courts have been struggling ever since. One of those arguably open issues is whether ...
For only $95 a month (the price of 2 article purchases)
Receive unlimited article access and full access to our archives,
Daily Appellate Report, award winning columns, and our
Verdicts and Settlements.
Or
$795 for an entire year!
Or access this article for $45
(Purchase provides 7-day access to this article. Printing, posting or downloading is not allowed.)
Already a subscriber?
Sign In