Labor/Employment
Apr. 9, 2016
Sizzle over suitable seating
Despite what some have suggested, a recent ruling does not portend sweeping changes in workplace seating practices. By Katherine Forster
Katherine M. Forster
Munger, Tolles & Olson LLP
350 S Grand Ave Fl 50
Los Angeles , CA 90071
Phone: (213) 683-9538
Fax: (213) 593-2838
Email: katherine.forster@mto.com
USC Law School; Los Angeles CA
Contrary to what some early commentators have suggested, the California Supreme Court's ruling in Kilby v. CVS Pharmacy Inc., 2016 DJDAR 3230 (April 4, 2016), does not portend sweeping changes in workplace seating practices. The court repeatedly emphasized practicality and feasibility. Indeed, the analytical framework provided by the court all but invites the lower courts to reach results consistent, in many if not...
For only $95 a month (the price of 2 article purchases)
Receive unlimited article access and full access to our archives,
Daily Appellate Report, award winning columns, and our
Verdicts and Settlements.
Or
$795 for an entire year!
Or access this article for $45
(Purchase provides 7-day access to this article. Printing, posting or downloading is not allowed.)
Already a subscriber?
Sign In