This is the property of the Daily Journal Corporation and fully protected by copyright. It is made available only to Daily Journal subscribers for personal or collaborative purposes and may not be distributed, reproduced, modified, stored or transferred without written permission. Please click "Reprint" to order presentation-ready copies to distribute to clients or use in commercial marketing materials or for permission to post on a website. and copyright (showing year of publication) at the bottom.
Subscribe to the Daily Journal for access to Daily Appellate Reports, Verdicts, Judicial Profiles and more...

Litigation

Feb. 14, 2001

Appellate Court Ruling Favors Cellphone Users

LOS ANGELES - Cellphone users can pursue claims for damages against their wireless service providers in state court, an appellate court has ruled. An award of monetary damages in a false-advertising suit is not an attempt by the state to regulate the rates charged, the 2nd District Court of Appeal concluded. Speilhotz v. Superior Court (Los Angeles Cellular Telephone Company), 2001 Daily Journal D.A.R. 1541 (Cal. App. 2nd Dist. Feb. 8, 2001).

Dawn Piimanu
Daily Journal Staff Writer
        LOS ANGELES - Cellphone users can pursue claims for damages against their wireless service providers in state court, an appellate court has ruled.
        An award of monetary damages in a false-advertising suit is not an attempt ...

To continue reading, please subscribe.
For only $95 a month (the price of 2 article purchases)
Receive unlimited article access and full access to our archives,
Daily Appellate Report, award winning columns, and our
Verdicts and Settlements.
Or
$795 for an entire year!

Or access this article for $45
(Purchase provides 7-day access to this article. Printing, posting or downloading is not allowed.)

Already a subscriber?

Enewsletter Sign-up