This is the property of the Daily Journal Corporation and fully protected by copyright. It is made available only to Daily Journal subscribers for personal or collaborative purposes and may not be distributed, reproduced, modified, stored or transferred without written permission. Please click "Reprint" to order presentation-ready copies to distribute to clients or use in commercial marketing materials or for permission to post on a website. and copyright (showing year of publication) at the bottom.
Subscribe to the Daily Journal for access to Daily Appellate Reports, Verdicts, Judicial Profiles and more...

Labor/Employment

Feb. 9, 2001

Look Forward

Luce Forward argued that mandatory arbitration agreements can encompass claims for discrimination and that Duffield was wrongly decided.

        By Julie A. Dunne
        
        The California Supreme Court, in Armendariz v. Foundation Health Psychcare Services Inc., 24 Cal.4th 83 (2000), held that employers may make mandatory arbitration agreements a condition of employment as long as the proposed mandatory arbitration agreement meets certain fairness and due-proc...

To continue reading, please subscribe.
For only $95 a month (the price of 2 article purchases)
Receive unlimited article access and full access to our archives,
Daily Appellate Report, award winning columns, and our
Verdicts and Settlements.
Or
$795 for an entire year!

Or access this article for $45
(Purchase provides 7-day access to this article. Printing, posting or downloading is not allowed.)

Already a subscriber?

Sign up for Daily Journal emails