This is the property of the Daily Journal Corporation and fully protected by copyright. It is made available only to Daily Journal subscribers for personal or collaborative purposes and may not be distributed, reproduced, modified, stored or transferred without written permission. Please click "Reprint" to order presentation-ready copies to distribute to clients or use in commercial marketing materials or for permission to post on a website. and copyright (showing year of publication) at the bottom.
Subscribe to the Daily Journal for access to Daily Appellate Reports, Verdicts, Judicial Profiles and more...

Litigation

Feb. 6, 2001

Fact Track

An attorney must pack his bag with plenty of facts - and evidence to back them up - before he takes the next train to the courthouse. Although railroads may still be king, the question of foreseeability reigns supreme for them and other property owners sued in premises-liability cases. The rules regarding whether tracks must be fenced may not change, but the courts wants a full record before a foreseeability determination is made.

        By Clyde Hutchinson and Eric Mueller
        
        An attorney must pack his bag with plenty of facts - and evidence to back them up - before he takes the next train to the courthouse. Although railroads may still be king, the question of foreseeability reigns supreme for them and other property owners sued in premises-liability ca...

To continue reading, please subscribe.
For only $95 a month (the price of 2 article purchases)
Receive unlimited article access and full access to our archives,
Daily Appellate Report, award winning columns, and our
Verdicts and Settlements.
Or
$795 for an entire year!

Or access this article for $45
(Purchase provides 7-day access to this article. Printing, posting or downloading is not allowed.)

Already a subscriber?

Enewsletter Sign-up