This is the property of the Daily Journal Corporation and fully protected by copyright. It is made available only to Daily Journal subscribers for personal or collaborative purposes and may not be distributed, reproduced, modified, stored or transferred without written permission. Please click "Reprint" to order presentation-ready copies to distribute to clients or use in commercial marketing materials or for permission to post on a website. and copyright (showing year of publication) at the bottom.
Subscribe to the Daily Journal for access to Daily Appellate Reports, Verdicts, Judicial Profiles and more...

Litigation

Nov. 15, 2001

Out of Balance

Mediation and other forms of alternative dispute resolution are praised as ways to avoid trial. Much is written in favor of mediation, yet little criticism of its downside, which can be significant, appears. Advocates of mediation list cost, uncertainty and the emotional trauma of trial as the downside of litigation. Proponents of mediation also argue that it allows the parties to maintain control over how their dispute is resolved.

        By David M. Grey

        Mediation and other forms of alternative dispute resolution are praised as ways to avoid trial. Much is written in favor of mediation, yet little criticism of its downside, which can be significant, appears. Advocates of mediation list cost, uncertainty and the emotional trauma of trial as the downside of litigation. Proponents of mediation also...

To continue reading, please subscribe.

Already a subscriber?

Or access this article for $45
(Purchase provides 7-day access to this article. Printing, posting or downloading is not allowed.)