This is the property of the Daily Journal Corporation and fully protected by copyright. It is made available only to Daily Journal subscribers for personal or collaborative purposes and may not be distributed, reproduced, modified, stored or transferred without written permission. Please click "Reprint" to order presentation-ready copies to distribute to clients or use in commercial marketing materials or for permission to post on a website. and copyright (showing year of publication) at the bottom.
Subscribe to the Daily Journal for access to Daily Appellate Reports, Verdicts, Judicial Profiles and more...

Personal Injury & Torts

Nov. 22, 2000

Justices Toss Ruling on Amending Complaint

An elderly, illiterate woman crippled by surgery may substitute a fictitious defendant with a real one - an anesthesiologist - after the statute of limitations expired because she was not aware that her injuries stemmed from the administration of the anesthetic.

By Dawn Piimanu
Daily Journal Staff Writer
        An elderly, illiterate woman crippled by surgery may substitute a fictitious defendant with a real one - an anesthesiologist - after the statute of limitations expired because she was not aware that her injuries stemmed from the administration of the anesthetic.
 ...

To continue reading, please subscribe.

Already a subscriber?

Or access this article for $45
(Purchase provides 7-day access to this article. Printing, posting or downloading is not allowed.)