By Catherine M. Stefani
The recently decided case of Lawler v. Jacobs, 83 Cal.App.4th 723 (2000), affirms that the exception to Code of Civil Procedure Section 580b carved out in Spangler v. Memel, 7 Cal.3d 603 (1972), is a thin one. California anti-deficiency laws, among other things, prevent a secur...
The recently decided case of Lawler v. Jacobs, 83 Cal.App.4th 723 (2000), affirms that the exception to Code of Civil Procedure Section 580b carved out in Spangler v. Memel, 7 Cal.3d 603 (1972), is a thin one. California anti-deficiency laws, among other things, prevent a secur...
To continue reading, please subscribe.
For only $95 a month (the price of 2 article purchases)
Receive unlimited article access and full access to our archives,
Daily Appellate Report, award winning columns, and our
Verdicts and Settlements.
Or
$795 for an entire year!
For only $95 a month (the price of 2 article purchases)
Receive unlimited article access and full access to our archives,
Daily Appellate Report, award winning columns, and our
Verdicts and Settlements.
Or
$795 for an entire year!
Or access this article for $45
(Purchase provides 7-day access to this article. Printing, posting or downloading is not allowed.)
Already a subscriber?
Sign In