Labor/Employment,
Government,
Administrative/Regulatory
May 24, 2017
Concerns about proposed 'utilization scheduling' bill
Can Assembly Bill 5, the Opportunity to Work Act, fashioned and passed in the Silicon Valley "bubble," serve as a model across California's varied industries and regions?
Kristina M. Launey
Managing Partner, Sacramento
Seyfarth Shaw LLP
400 Capitol Mall #2350
Sacramento , CA 95814
Phone: (916) 448-0159
Email: klauney@seyfarth.com
Kristina is in the firm's Labor and Employment Department.
Daniel C. Whang
Partner
Seyfarth Shaw LLP
2029 Century Park E Ste 3500
Los Angeles , CA 90067
Phone: (310) 277-7200
Email: dwhang@seyfarth.com
Univ of Chicago Law School
Danie is in the firm's Employment Department.
Over the past several years, an employer's ability to schedule employee work hours according to business needs has been the target of increasing legislative activity. In 2015 and 2016, the California Legislature attempted predictable scheduling legislation with the Fair Scheduling Act of 2015 (Assembly Bill 357) and Reliable Scheduling Act of 2016 (Senate Bill 878) - which would have required employers to provide employees with work schedules one or two weeks in advance of scheduled shifts...
For only $95 a month (the price of 2 article purchases)
Receive unlimited article access and full access to our archives,
Daily Appellate Report, award winning columns, and our
Verdicts and Settlements.
Or
$795 for an entire year!
Or access this article for $45
(Purchase provides 7-day access to this article. Printing, posting or downloading is not allowed.)
Already a subscriber?
Sign In