This is the property of the Daily Journal Corporation and fully protected by copyright. It is made available only to Daily Journal subscribers for personal or collaborative purposes and may not be distributed, reproduced, modified, stored or transferred without written permission. Please click "Reprint" to order presentation-ready copies to distribute to clients or use in commercial marketing materials or for permission to post on a website. and copyright (showing year of publication) at the bottom.
Subscribe to the Daily Journal for access to Daily Appellate Reports, Verdicts, Judicial Profiles and more...

Perspective

Jul. 16, 2014

High court clears up 'enforcement fees' rules

In McQueen, the state high court held that a conservator may not recover attorney fees incurred in fraudulent transfer action to enforce separate judgment, which had already been satisfied. By Paul D. Fogel and Brian A. Sutherland


By Paul D. Fogel and Brian A. Sutherland


Just when you think it's over, it's not.


You've won your damages action against the defendant and also persuaded the trial court to award attorney fees under a fee-shifting statute that entitles your client to fees. Game over, right? Nope. The defendant appeals, causing your client to incur additional fees defending the judgment. And to make things worse, the defendant doesn't post a bond, fo...

To continue reading, please subscribe.
For only $95 a month (the price of 2 article purchases)
Receive unlimited article access and full access to our archives,
Daily Appellate Report, award winning columns, and our
Verdicts and Settlements.
Or
$795 for an entire year!

Or access this article for $45
(Purchase provides 7-day access to this article. Printing, posting or downloading is not allowed.)

Already a subscriber?

Enewsletter Sign-up