This is the property of the Daily Journal Corporation and fully protected by copyright. It is made available only to Daily Journal subscribers for personal or collaborative purposes and may not be distributed, reproduced, modified, stored or transferred without written permission. Please click "Reprint" to order presentation-ready copies to distribute to clients or use in commercial marketing materials or for permission to post on a website. and copyright (showing year of publication) at the bottom.
Subscribe to the Daily Journal for access to Daily Appellate Reports, Verdicts, Judicial Profiles and more...

Labor/Employment,
California Supreme Court

Jul. 12, 2014

Dim future for coerced union dues

A state Supreme Court decision cast doubt onto the constitutionality of public employees being compelled to pay dues to the union representing their work force. By Michael A. Carvin, James M. Burnham and William D. Coglianese

Michael A. Carvin

Partner
Jones Day

See more...

James Burnham

Associate
Jones Day

See more...

William D. Coglianese

Associate
Jones Day

See more...

On June 30, for the second time in its past three terms, the U.S. Supreme Court issued a decision casting great doubt onto the constitutionality of the public-sector "agency shop," under which public employees are compelled to pay dues to the union representing their work force, even if the employee is not a union member and vehemently disagrees with many positions the union takes in collective bargaining. In Harris v. Quinn, 2014 DJDAR 8567, a majority of the court cataloged the ...

To continue reading, please subscribe.
For only $95 a month (the price of 2 article purchases)
Receive unlimited article access and full access to our archives,
Daily Appellate Report, award winning columns, and our
Verdicts and Settlements.
Or
$795 for an entire year!

Or access this article for $45
(Purchase provides 7-day access to this article. Printing, posting or downloading is not allowed.)

Already a subscriber?

Enewsletter Sign-up