This is the property of the Daily Journal Corporation and fully protected by copyright. It is made available only to Daily Journal subscribers for personal or collaborative purposes and may not be distributed, reproduced, modified, stored or transferred without written permission. Please click "Reprint" to order presentation-ready copies to distribute to clients or use in commercial marketing materials or for permission to post on a website. and copyright (showing year of publication) at the bottom.
Subscribe to the Daily Journal for access to Daily Appellate Reports, Verdicts, Judicial Profiles and more...

U.S. Court of Appeals for the 9th Circuit

Jul. 4, 2014

Sanctions overturned against court-appointed criminal defense lawyer

When a court-appointed California lawyer sought compensation for representing his federal murder defendant client, a judge unfairly accused him of extorting the court, a 9th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals panel has ruled.


By John Roemer


Daily Journal Staff Writer


Federal trial judges hold the power of the purse over court-appointed criminal defense lawyers, signing paperwork so they get paid for their time and expenses. Or not signing.


When a court-appointed California lawyer sought long-delayed compensation for representing his federal murder defendant client, the move triggered hostility from a Reno trial judge who unfairly accused him of extorting the court...

To continue reading, please subscribe.
For only $95 a month (the price of 2 article purchases)
Receive unlimited article access and full access to our archives,
Daily Appellate Report, award winning columns, and our
Verdicts and Settlements.
Or
$795 for an entire year!

Or access this article for $45
(Purchase provides 7-day access to this article. Printing, posting or downloading is not allowed.)

Already a subscriber?

Enewsletter Sign-up