Daily Journal Staff Writer
A proposed change to judicial branch rules that's slated to pass without discussion at Friday's Judicial Council meeting represents a small but noteworthy victory for the state's trial courts in the balance of power within the branch.
Rather than relying on a select few courts' presiding judges to pick nominees for a prized seat on the Judicial Council, presiding judges for all 58 super...
To continue reading, please subscribe.
For only $95 a month (the price of 2 article purchases)
Receive unlimited article access and full access to our archives,
Daily Appellate Report, award winning columns, and our
Verdicts and Settlements.
Or
$795 for an entire year!
For only $95 a month (the price of 2 article purchases)
Receive unlimited article access and full access to our archives,
Daily Appellate Report, award winning columns, and our
Verdicts and Settlements.
Or
$795 for an entire year!
Or access this article for $45
(Purchase provides 7-day access to this article. Printing, posting or downloading is not allowed.)
Already a subscriber?
Sign In