Letter to the Editor
Jun. 25, 2013
Litigants entitled to full explanations of decisions
Re: Profile of Justice Stephen J. Kane, June 13. By Joel Drum
LETTERS TO THE EDITOR COLUMN
So Justice Stephen J. Kane thinks most cases should only have two-paragraph opinions. [Profile of Justice Stephen J. Kane, June 13]. This, of course, would encourage dishonest justices (yes, they are out there). If a group of justices is inclined to a particular result, in spite of the applicable law, they would be free to do this. There would be no need to support the conclusion of the court. Furthermore, all litigants ...For only $95 a month (the price of 2 article purchases)
Receive unlimited article access and full access to our archives,
Daily Appellate Report, award winning columns, and our
Verdicts and Settlements.
Or
$795 for an entire year!
Or access this article for $45
(Purchase provides 7-day access to this article. Printing, posting or downloading is not allowed.)
Already a subscriber?
Sign In