U.S. Supreme Court
Jun. 22, 2013
Justices bolster arbitrators' contract interpretations
Last week's unanimous decision in Oxford Health demonstrates the difficulty of getting judicial review of an arbitrator's interpretation of a contract. By Thomas P. Gies, Jennifer Romano and Moreen O'Brien
The Supreme Court has jumped back into the class arbitration waiver wars. Last week's unanimous decision in Oxford Health Plans LLC v. Sutter, 2013 DJDAR 7319 (June 10, 2013), demonstrates the difficulty of getting judicial review of an arbitrator's interpretation of a contract. Oxford Health also highlights several practical concerns for parties seeking to draft contracts precluding ...
For only $95 a month (the price of 2 article purchases)
Receive unlimited article access and full access to our archives,
Daily Appellate Report, award winning columns, and our
Verdicts and Settlements.
Or
$795 for an entire year!
Or access this article for $45
(Purchase provides 7-day access to this article. Printing, posting or downloading is not allowed.)
Already a subscriber?
Sign In