This is the property of the Daily Journal Corporation and fully protected by copyright. It is made available only to Daily Journal subscribers for personal or collaborative purposes and may not be distributed, reproduced, modified, stored or transferred without written permission. Please click "Reprint" to order presentation-ready copies to distribute to clients or use in commercial marketing materials or for permission to post on a website. and copyright (showing year of publication) at the bottom.
Subscribe to the Daily Journal for access to Daily Appellate Reports, Verdicts, Judicial Profiles and more...

Perspective

Jun. 20, 2013

Catalyst theory still a viable route to attorney fees

Although California had followed the federal lead in adopting the catalyst theory, it did not abandon when the U.S. Supreme Court deemed it too cumbersome a test. Instead, California clarified the rule. By Gerald Knapton


By Gerald Knapton


The "catalyst theory" is important to consider when you agree to settle. Suppose, for example, that an admirable, nonprofit charity has been selling proselytizing T-shirts for years along your client's main entryway, and your client decides to enact new rules to prohibit any sales of any kind by anyone. When the charity files a lawsuit, your client agrees to let them continue selling. What could go wrong?


In the past, man...

To continue reading, please subscribe.
For only $95 a month (the price of 2 article purchases)
Receive unlimited article access and full access to our archives,
Daily Appellate Report, award winning columns, and our
Verdicts and Settlements.
Or
$795 for an entire year!

Or access this article for $45
(Purchase provides 7-day access to this article. Printing, posting or downloading is not allowed.)

Already a subscriber?

Enewsletter Sign-up