This is the property of the Daily Journal Corporation and fully protected by copyright. It is made available only to Daily Journal subscribers for personal or collaborative purposes and may not be distributed, reproduced, modified, stored or transferred without written permission. Please click "Reprint" to order presentation-ready copies to distribute to clients or use in commercial marketing materials or for permission to post on a website. and copyright (showing year of publication) at the bottom.
Subscribe to the Daily Journal for access to Daily Appellate Reports, Verdicts, Judicial Profiles and more...

Litigation

Jun. 24, 2010

Which Client Costs Are Tax Deductible?

When contingent fee lawyers pay out-of-pocket costs, it matters how the accounting is done and how the fee agreement is worded. Robert Wood of Wood & Porter explains why.

By Robert W. Wood

Most contingent fee lawyers cannot get a client to pay out-of-pocket costs on an ongoing basis, so the lawyer must pay them. But is the lawyer advancing the costs (to be collected later upon settlement) or simply undertaking the obligation to pay them? Does it matter how the accounting is done and how the fee agreement is worded?

Yes, it matters, and it is surprising that much of the plaintiff's bar doesn't ...

To continue reading, please subscribe.
For only $95 a month (the price of 2 article purchases)
Receive unlimited article access and full access to our archives,
Daily Appellate Report, award winning columns, and our
Verdicts and Settlements.
Or
$795 for an entire year!

Or access this article for $45
(Purchase provides 7-day access to this article. Printing, posting or downloading is not allowed.)

Already a subscriber?

Enewsletter Sign-up