This is the property of the Daily Journal Corporation and fully protected by copyright. It is made available only to Daily Journal subscribers for personal or collaborative purposes and may not be distributed, reproduced, modified, stored or transferred without written permission. Please click "Reprint" to order presentation-ready copies to distribute to clients or use in commercial marketing materials or for permission to post on a website. and copyright (showing year of publication) at the bottom.
Subscribe to the Daily Journal for access to Daily Appellate Reports, Verdicts, Judicial Profiles and more...

U.S. Supreme Court

Jun. 19, 2010

High Court Skirts Takings Issue

In an important property rights case, the U.S. Supreme Court Thursday just about ducked the broad constitutional question in ruling that ocean-front property owners in Florida do not deserve compensation for a state program that added a strip of public beach in front of their homes.

By Lawrence Hurley

Daily Journal Staff Writer

WASHINGTON - In an important property rights case, the U.S. Supreme Court Thursday just about ducked the broad constitutional question in ruling that ocean-front property owners in Florida do not deserve compensation for a state program that added a strip of public beach in front of their homes.

The property owners claimed a decision by the Florida Supreme Court upholding the state...

To continue reading, please subscribe.
For only $95 a month (the price of 2 article purchases)
Receive unlimited article access and full access to our archives,
Daily Appellate Report, award winning columns, and our
Verdicts and Settlements.
Or
$795 for an entire year!

Or access this article for $45
(Purchase provides 7-day access to this article. Printing, posting or downloading is not allowed.)

Already a subscriber?

Enewsletter Sign-up