This is the property of the Daily Journal Corporation and fully protected by copyright. It is made available only to Daily Journal subscribers for personal or collaborative purposes and may not be distributed, reproduced, modified, stored or transferred without written permission. Please click "Reprint" to order presentation-ready copies to distribute to clients or use in commercial marketing materials or for permission to post on a website. and copyright (showing year of publication) at the bottom.
Subscribe to the Daily Journal for access to Daily Appellate Reports, Verdicts, Judicial Profiles and more...

Litigation

Jun. 18, 2010

Toyota Plaintiffs Face Tough Road

Plaintiffs in auto crash cases have faced a long history of stumbling blocks in proving electrical magnetic interference caused sudden unintended acceleration in their vehicles.

By Gabe Friedman

Daily Journal Staff Writer

LOS ANGELES - Ralph Stimson claims he never touched the accelerator when his Ford Aerostar shot out of his driveway and slammed into a telephone pole.

The accident in 2003 left his wife Peggy confined to a wheelchair, paralyzed from the waist down. But in a lawsuit against Ford that went to trial in Tampa this February, the auto maker argued it was driver error: Stimson must have acci...

To continue reading, please subscribe.
For only $95 a month (the price of 2 article purchases)
Receive unlimited article access and full access to our archives,
Daily Appellate Report, award winning columns, and our
Verdicts and Settlements.
Or
$795 for an entire year!

Or access this article for $45
(Purchase provides 7-day access to this article. Printing, posting or downloading is not allowed.)

Already a subscriber?

Enewsletter Sign-up