This is the property of the Daily Journal Corporation and fully protected by copyright. It is made available only to Daily Journal subscribers for personal or collaborative purposes and may not be distributed, reproduced, modified, stored or transferred without written permission. Please click "Reprint" to order presentation-ready copies to distribute to clients or use in commercial marketing materials or for permission to post on a website. and copyright (showing year of publication) at the bottom.
Subscribe to the Daily Journal for access to Daily Appellate Reports, Verdicts, Judicial Profiles and more...

Constitutional Law

Jun. 18, 2010

Ninth Circuit Has Chance to Correct Flawed Takings Decision

Next week, the 9th Circuit will determine whether the U.S. Constitution should be read to reward investors in a mobile home park at the expense of taxpayers, says John Echeverria of Vermont Law School.

By John D. Echeverria

In an important but relatively little noted case, the federal appeals court for California will hear argument next week on whether the U.S. Constitution should be read to reward investors in a mobile home park with a once in a life time killing on their investment - at the expense of taxpayers and mostly elderly and moderate-income mobile home residents.

The case, Guggenheim v. City of Goleta, involves a claim un...

To continue reading, please subscribe.
For only $95 a month (the price of 2 article purchases)
Receive unlimited article access and full access to our archives,
Daily Appellate Report, award winning columns, and our
Verdicts and Settlements.
Or
$795 for an entire year!

Or access this article for $45
(Purchase provides 7-day access to this article. Printing, posting or downloading is not allowed.)

Already a subscriber?

Enewsletter Sign-up