This is the property of the Daily Journal Corporation and fully protected by copyright. It is made available only to Daily Journal subscribers for personal or collaborative purposes and may not be distributed, reproduced, modified, stored or transferred without written permission. Please click "Reprint" to order presentation-ready copies to distribute to clients or use in commercial marketing materials or for permission to post on a website. and copyright (showing year of publication) at the bottom.
Subscribe to the Daily Journal for access to Daily Appellate Reports, Verdicts, Judicial Profiles and more...

California Supreme Court

Jun. 16, 2010

Another Exception for Judicial Review of Arbitration Awards

The California Supreme Court has carved yet another exception for judicial review of an arbitration award, write John Taylor Jr. and Jeremy Rosen of Horvitz & Levy.

By John A. Taylor Jr. and Jeremy B. Rosen

Almost two decades ago, in Moncharsh v. Heily & Blase, 3 Cal. 4th 1 (1992), the California Supreme Court held that under the California Arbitration Act (CAA), a court is not permitted to vacate an arbitration award based on errors of law by the arbitrator (with certain narrow statutory exceptions). That holding was considered virtually inviolable until two years ago, when one member of the Court observ...

To continue reading, please subscribe.
For only $95 a month (the price of 2 article purchases)
Receive unlimited article access and full access to our archives,
Daily Appellate Report, award winning columns, and our
Verdicts and Settlements.
Or
$795 for an entire year!

Or access this article for $45
(Purchase provides 7-day access to this article. Printing, posting or downloading is not allowed.)

Already a subscriber?

Enewsletter Sign-up