By John A. Taylor Jr. and Jeremy B. Rosen
Almost two decades ago, in Moncharsh v. Heily & Blase, 3 Cal. 4th 1 (1992), the California Supreme Court held that under the California Arbitration Act (CAA), a court is not permitted to vacate an arbitration award based on errors of law by the arbitrator (with certain narrow statutory exceptions). That holding was considered virtually inviolable until two years ago, when one member of the Court observ...
To continue reading, please subscribe.
For only $95 a month (the price of 2 article purchases)
Receive unlimited article access and full access to our archives,
Daily Appellate Report, award winning columns, and our
Verdicts and Settlements.
Or
$795 for an entire year!
For only $95 a month (the price of 2 article purchases)
Receive unlimited article access and full access to our archives,
Daily Appellate Report, award winning columns, and our
Verdicts and Settlements.
Or
$795 for an entire year!
Or access this article for $45
(Purchase provides 7-day access to this article. Printing, posting or downloading is not allowed.)
Already a subscriber?
Sign In