This is the property of the Daily Journal Corporation and fully protected by copyright. It is made available only to Daily Journal subscribers for personal or collaborative purposes and may not be distributed, reproduced, modified, stored or transferred without written permission. Please click "Reprint" to order presentation-ready copies to distribute to clients or use in commercial marketing materials or for permission to post on a website. and copyright (showing year of publication) at the bottom.
Subscribe to the Daily Journal for access to Daily Appellate Reports, Verdicts, Judicial Profiles and more...

Perspective

Jun. 15, 2010

Barristers to Blogs: Softening Ethical Restrictions in the Digital Age

Historically, the legal profession has frowned upon attorney marketing and advertising. But that's changing, says Michael Lubofsky of Scott Cole & Associates.

By Michael S. Lubofsky

Throughout its history, the legal profession has frowned upon attorney advertising and marketing. From early British barristers to the first ethical canons issued by the American Bar Association in 1908, the dominant attitude has held that attorneys should refrain from any type of self-promotion. Though the ABA's Model Code, issued in 1969, and the 1977 Supreme Court decision in Bates v. State of Arizona, somewhat eased p...

To continue reading, please subscribe.
For only $95 a month (the price of 2 article purchases)
Receive unlimited article access and full access to our archives,
Daily Appellate Report, award winning columns, and our
Verdicts and Settlements.
Or
$795 for an entire year!

Or access this article for $45
(Purchase provides 7-day access to this article. Printing, posting or downloading is not allowed.)

Already a subscriber?

Enewsletter Sign-up