This is the property of the Daily Journal Corporation and fully protected by copyright. It is made available only to Daily Journal subscribers for personal or collaborative purposes and may not be distributed, reproduced, modified, stored or transferred without written permission. Please click "Reprint" to order presentation-ready copies to distribute to clients or use in commercial marketing materials or for permission to post on a website. and copyright (showing year of publication) at the bottom.
Subscribe to the Daily Journal for access to Daily Appellate Reports, Verdicts, Judicial Profiles and more...

Forum (Forum & Focus)

Feb. 14, 2009

Judges Should Show More Restraint in Granting Restraining Orders

Family law judges sometimes lean too far in the direction of granting restraining orders when there are not sufficient legal bases to do so, writes Fred Silberberg.

FORUM COLUMN

By Fred Silberberg

Restraining orders exist for a purpose. In family law, they are sought more commonly than in other forms of litigation. As a result of the often tempest-tossed emotional nature of family law cases, the need for restraining orders is much more common. Domestic violence is not an uncommon phenomenon in the households of America, and a family law dispute, even people who would not otherwise be violent engage in threate...

To continue reading, please subscribe.
For only $95 a month (the price of 2 article purchases)
Receive unlimited article access and full access to our archives,
Daily Appellate Report, award winning columns, and our
Verdicts and Settlements.
Or
$795 for an entire year!

Or access this article for $45
(Purchase provides 7-day access to this article. Printing, posting or downloading is not allowed.)

Already a subscriber?

Enewsletter Sign-up